Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
You are not logged in.
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
#db# Prox/RFID mark3 RFID instrument
#db# bootrom: svn 498-unclean 2011-09-19 16:08:36
#db# os: svn 498-unclean 2011-09-19 16:08:40
#db# FPGA image built on 2009/12/ 8 at 8: 3:54
Hi,
I try to find answer for this I try two mf1k cards from same manufacturer date and etc... one card return all valid keys and all keys works another card return this:
isOk:01
uid(a76161f1) nt(1123af76) par(acac5c94a40c6434) ks(000c00080503030b)
|diff|{nr} |ks3|ks3^5|parity |
+----+--------+---+-----+---------------+
| 00 |00000000| 0 | 5 |0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1|
| 20 |00000020| c | 9 |0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1|
| 40 |00000040| 0 | 5 |0,0,1,1,1,0,1,0|
| 60 |00000060| 8 | d |0,0,1,0,1,0,0,1|
| 80 |00000080| 5 | 0 |0,0,1,0,0,1,0,1|
| a0 |000000a0| 3 | 6 |0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0|
| c0 |000000c0| 3 | 6 |0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0|
| e0 |000000e0| b | e |0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0|
#db# COMMAND mifare FINISHED
------------------------------------------------------------------
Key found:b6ddb9830000
Found invalid key. ( Nt=1123af76I try nested attack result:
proxmark3> hf mf nested 1 0 A b6ddb9830000
--block no:00 key type:00 key:b6 dd b9 83 00 00 etrans:0
Block shift=0
Testing known keys. Sector count=16
nested...
.#db# Authentication failed. Card timeout.
#db# Auth1 error
Try nested with other keys results same, bug or card problem?
Thank You for help.
Offline
You could solve?
Offline
Nope:(
Offline
Please read the documentation http://code.google.com/p/proxmark3/wiki/Mifare
after an invalid key you must relaunch the command mifare with previous NT
Found invalid key. ( Nt=1123af76
Offline
Please read the documentation http://code.google.com/p/proxmark3/wiki/Mifare
after an invalid key you must relaunch the command mifare with previous NTFound invalid key. ( Nt=1123af76
Jonor
The problem is not in reading the documentation but the error when executing the command, is always apear 'invalid key' . If not of the update from SVN or is it just the card can also break the card with another command called nested, but appears.
# db # Authentication failed. Card timeout.
# db # Auth1 mistake
that's the concern, rather
Offline
jonor look this link
http://proxmark.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1023
Offline
Hi,
Thanks for replies.
I tried ratte patch http://www.proxmark.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=979 when compiled without any warnings and reflashed pm3.
Now works fine I don't get .#db# Authentication failed. Card timeout. error.
hf mf mifare invalid nt works too, return valid key. Seems the problem was on source compiling for 'hf mf mifare' for .#db# Authentication failed. Card timeout. error. ratte patch fixed it. It should be updated in svn.
Thanks Ratte!
Offline
Then you upgrade to the latest SVN version 499 to fix the problem or simply returned to falsh the same version again, with the correction of the bug, domasc?
Offline
Hi Kra,
Yes I updated to 499 svn but as I see there is only changes for Clone HID to T55x in 499 svn.
So I think the problem is that I have compiled source bad, look in compiling log file is there any warnings or errors? I have all errors fixed and updated with ratte patch, now everything works perfect
Offline
The problem is not in reading the documentation but the error when executing the command, is always apear 'invalid key' . If not of the update from SVN or is it just the card can also break the card with another command called nested, but appears.
The documentation tell "hf mf nested" command must be launched with VALID KEY, and domasc launch it with INVALID KEY from previous command.
If the command "hf mf mifare" return always "invalid key" is another problem. Search in the forum someone think the bug is correct in new mifare card.
Offline
Hi Kra,
Yes I updated to 499 svn but as I see there is only changes for Clone HID to T55x in 499 svn.
So I think the problem is that I have compiled source bad, look in compiling log file is there any warnings or errors? I have all errors fixed and updated with ratte patch, now everything works perfect
Could your send me your folders in a zip file of your last version (499) in a link ... to falsh my device with your files, because I had the same problem, the more likely is the compilation as you say, I would appreciate whit all my soul
Gracias!!
Offline
Pages: 1